Game-play: Redefine "skill" for Cosmic Break

Charz wrote:

Case Closed.
I am done with this
its going NOWHERE.
if i continue arguing with you it will just lead nowhere and most likely i feel like i am feeding "TROLLS"

The only troll here is you.

Charz wrote:

Case Closed.
I am done with this
its going NOWHERE.
if i continue arguing with you it will just lead nowhere and most likely i feel like i am feeding "TROLLS"

You're making it too easy!
Internet rule #25-167: If you're making it easy to get trolled, you WILL be trolled, even by people who do not usually troll.

At least Seed is willing to argue his point reasonably(citing sources, now that's new). You're welcome to espouse your opinion as much as possible, but if you have nothing but your own points to support it, nobody will believe you.

Also, ranting about being called a fag really didn't help you. Being called a fag on these forums should really be the least of your problems.

some day i will make your life in game hard just like you did with me on the forums i promise
you lxe

Charz wrote:

some day i will make your life in game hard just like you did with me on the forums i promise
you lxe

lol is that a threat
Bitch please, like all normal players' lives weren't made hard by the addition of FC Slutraph

Charz wrote:

some day i will make your life in game hard just like you did with me on the forums i promise
you lxe

Come at me bro.

Charz wrote:

some day i will make your life in game hard just like you did with me on the forums i promise
you lxe

>IMPLYING LXE EVEN FUCKING PLAYS ANYMORE

It's funny, you have a resha
you suck with one, and you are faget because sucking with resha is so hard to do its not even funny
and having a resha, and doing good with said, will still make you a faget
either way, have fun being a all that is wrong in this game.

Ontopic
just shut up and enjoy the game until it dies, won't be long anyways.

>implying this game will die with the money it's raking in

Yeah, I really do believe Charz is one of those "bad" Reshas, if that's even possible.
Ive seen you in arena and I don't really hesitate saying so :V
But how?!

>Resha
>being out scored by a Seraph (regular)
:S

DaneDroid wrote:

just shut up and enjoy the game until it dies, won't be long anyways.

It's funny because this is what people were saying 16 months ago.

Suguri wrote:

DaneDroid wrote:

just shut up and enjoy the game until it dies, won't be long anyways.

It's funny because this is what people were saying 16 months ago.

Haha I was about to say something like that. I just wasn't sure when the first time it was said.

This is all getting off-topic now O_o

Malphes wrote:

Charz wrote:

some day i will make your life in game hard just like you did with me on the forums i promise
you lxe

>IMPLYING LXE EVEN FUCKING PLAYS ANYMORE

Lol. Malphunction.

LS3 wrote:

"bad" Reshas, if that's even possible.

I can't remember how many of those Resha's I have killed.

DaneDroid wrote:

It's funny, you have a resha
you suck with one, and you are faget because sucking with resha is so hard to do its not even funny
and having a resha, and doing good with said, will still make you a faget
either way, have fun being a all that is wrong in this game.

Ontopic
just shut up and enjoy the game until it dies, won't be long anyways.

Vagcramp13 and Korone would like to see you.

I saw more baddies with Resha too.

Are GMT members even allowed to talk about fagets?

SeedZero wrote:

Suguri wrote:

DaneDroid wrote:

just shut up and enjoy the game until it dies, won't be long anyways.

It's funny because this is what people were saying 16 months ago.

Haha I was about to say something like that. I just wasn't sure when the first time it was said.

This is all getting off-topic now O_o

you know why it is because you gave us a lecture about skill in a pay to wine game with a troll community you wasted your time

Charz wrote:

SeedZero wrote:

Suguri wrote:

It's funny because this is what people were saying 16 months ago.

Haha I was about to say something like that. I just wasn't sure when the first time it was said.

This is all getting off-topic now O_o

you know why it is because you gave us a lecture about skill in a pay to wine game with a troll community you wasted your time

He's a lot fucking smarter than you are, though.

FireKiller87 wrote:

Charz wrote:

SeedZero wrote:

Haha I was about to say something like that. I just wasn't sure when the first time it was said.

This is all getting off-topic now O_o

you know why it is because you gave us a lecture about skill in a pay to wine game with a troll community you wasted your time

He's a lot fucking smarter than you are, though.

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, no fucking comment

Maybe because you're too retarded to think of one.

reVelske wrote:

Are GMT members even allowed to talk about fagets?

It's too bad I lost my Resha and Eris.

wwwwwww

I'm stuck with moebots like Icy now :3c

Helping the community rage less one moebot at a time ww.

reVelske wrote:

Are GMT members even allowed to talk about fagets?

Takes one to know one, etc.

-Aera- wrote:

I'm stuck with moebots

Case in point.

Back to original point.

Score at the end of the match doesn't = Skill because Score doesn't take into account several things.

1) Damaging a unit that is subsequently killed within say, 5 or 6 seconds. It doesn't tally Assists

2) Healing or Support a unit that subsequently kills a guy within 5 or 6 seconds. Another category of Assists.

3) Comparative strength. It doesn't take into account that your fully tuned Seraph Crimrose is overwhelmingly strong against Bob McNewbie's untuned level 5 default parts Destructor. Seraph's Score should not skyrocket from annihilating weak bots. It might take some account to Cost but as we all know not all costs are created equal.

4) Tanking. It doesn't take into account that you took 5k damage before being destroyed thanks to the help of your Support. You should be rewarded for having taken more damage during the duration of your life. (Not dieing repeatedly and taking lots of damage that way)

5) Damage against valuable targets. It doesn't take into account that you primarily dealt damage against Seraph Crimrose HDs. Bots that are stronger more should also provide for damage -> points.

6) Various other tidbits that would define someone of good skill. Is it good skill for a bot to provide cover fire and providing zone control while never actually hitting? The game doesn't think so.

-Aera- wrote:

Helping the community rage less one moebot at a time ww.

I believe that goes completely against GMT's mission statement, time to get fired.

If they added...

1) Assists

2) Winning

To the scoreboard it would promote teamplay. You are NOT rewarded for winning the match. You would get a better reward/score if you did nothing or damaged the enemy than did nothing than you would if you were in the fray and died.

I would usually get a better score these days if I shot a couple times and ran for cover with my TBG, because it doesn't help MY score to die to seraphs twice. Throws me into the negatives.

Me99909 wrote:

If they added...

1) Assists

2) Winning

To the scoreboard it would promote teamplay. You are NOT rewarded for winning the match. You would get a better reward/score if you did nothing or damaged the enemy than did nothing than you would if you were in the fray and died.

I would usually get a better score these days if I shot a couple times and ran for cover with my TBG, because it doesn't help MY score to die to seraphs twice. Throws me into the negatives.

Huh?

You're rewarded with more UC and shit for winning...

You are rewarded more UC and shit for doing things that lead to winning. You are not rewarded more UC and shit for being on the winning team with -1k score.

On a side note,

HD Seraph is OP and I will tell you why

6 (I think) shots that leave behind Chibi-bot sized zones of pain.

Each shot deals approximately 150-200 damage to any bot caught in the area.

Each shot has more homing than most missles.

Thats damage considered against my ART bot without Beam Guard. 18 TGH

Melee Bots with 40 Str deal 100-150 damage with their melee hits.

Its a mult-target zone-controlling aoe shot that deals more damage to ARTs than weapons ARTs are weak to.

Who in their right mind decided this was 'balanced'?

I might reduce some of that damage, 'maybe' down to 100 with 40 TGH. 75 with Beam Guard. I really don't have the resources nessecary to test that guesstimate.