Thoarla AM4

So is it a superior or inferior version compared to Thoarla AM 3, in my opinion its a matter of taste, but I would like to see what you guys think.

Winty wrote:

rei_hunter wrote:

Thoarla AM4 is basically a 170 Cost Weapon, with poor arm stats.

I mean, +5 Force, +5 Range, -20 Ammo and +200 INT for what, +30 Cost?

Ah wells, a Shaden can equip it at least, with 3 GForces. .-. (45 Force Lightning Gun seems fun. Close Ranging things)

the main flaw on AM3 is that it takes time to get out the damage, in a game where higher upfront damage is more important. AM4 has higher force and shoots 3 times per charge instead of 2 times, allowing it to output a higher amount of damage in a shorter time frame.

Dismissing the merits of a weapon based on a mathematical comparison to a previous weapon without acknowledging the inherent differences in the weapons is silly.

That_Wiesel_Guy wrote:

The bullet is larger.
It gets rid of unnecessary stats.
It's a 15 fucking cost difference for -20 ammo and 5 range. You'll have to add 50 more cost to am3 just to get the same force as AM4. Wow that's fucking 230 cost and seven shots/57 less range compared AM4! So fucking bad!

Force Force Hforce leaves 144 shots/297 range, but then there's no room to tune anything else.

http://www.cosmicbreakfanforum.com/t12836p15-if-you-have-toarla-am4-what-will-you-do