Ams that give good aim,ANd ams that give bad aim

Nerf wrote:

It's not a 'gay' aspect of the game -- it's an unique hidden value that only vets who've played for a long time will notice. It's a neat hidden quirk and knowing these quirks will give you an edge. Apparently you just want to make gundams... maybe you should spend your time buying gundam models instead and build those.

It's just another aspect that further reduces the number of viable parts. So, yeah, it is pretty gay.
Customization(笑)

VeryMelon wrote:

Nerf wrote:

It's not a 'gay' aspect of the game -- it's an unique hidden value that only vets who've played for a long time will notice. It's a neat hidden quirk and knowing these quirks will give you an edge. Apparently you just want to make gundams... maybe you should spend your time buying gundam models instead and build those.

It's just another aspect that further reduces the number of viable parts. So, yeah, it is pretty gay.
Customization(笑)

its also a way to make parts you wouldnt use stat wise more viable

but it sure is easier to look at only one side of the medal

Aurum_Sol wrote:

VeryMelon wrote:

Nerf wrote:

It's not a 'gay' aspect of the game -- it's an unique hidden value that only vets who've played for a long time will notice. It's a neat hidden quirk and knowing these quirks will give you an edge. Apparently you just want to make gundams... maybe you should spend your time buying gundam models instead and build those.

It's just another aspect that further reduces the number of viable parts. So, yeah, it is pretty gay.
Customization(笑)

its also a way to make parts you wouldnt use stat wise more viable

but it sure is easier to look at only one side of the medal

It also makes parts you would use stat wise not good suzuku ams great stats terribad aim.

boytitan2 wrote:

Aurum_Sol wrote:

VeryMelon wrote:

It's just another aspect that further reduces the number of viable parts. So, yeah, it is pretty gay.
Customization(笑)

its also a way to make parts you wouldnt use stat wise more viable

but it sure is easier to look at only one side of the medal

It also makes parts you would use stat wise not good suzuku ams great stats terribad aim.

listing the same argument twice doesnt make it twice as strong

Aurum_Sol wrote:

VeryMelon wrote:

Nerf wrote:

It's not a 'gay' aspect of the game -- it's an unique hidden value that only vets who've played for a long time will notice. It's a neat hidden quirk and knowing these quirks will give you an edge. Apparently you just want to make gundams... maybe you should spend your time buying gundam models instead and build those.

It's just another aspect that further reduces the number of viable parts. So, yeah, it is pretty gay.
Customization(笑)

its also a way to make parts you wouldnt use stat wise more viable

You have arms that have both good aim AND good stats, why would you use arms that have good aim but bad stats instead?

VeryMelon wrote:

Aurum_Sol wrote:

VeryMelon wrote:

It's just another aspect that further reduces the number of viable parts. So, yeah, it is pretty gay.
Customization(笑)

its also a way to make parts you wouldnt use stat wise more viable

You have arms that have both good aim AND good stats, why would you use arms that have good aim but bad stats instead?

because not everyone can afford to waste away parts on builds that will not utilize every statpoint the parts provide - and many builds end up with tune up fodder stats bigger than 1 but still to low to make an actual impact on the bots performance

btw: people that CAN afford to waste the parts on those builds can sometimes work around this by biting into the sour apple and tune with more slots (of course, only if the end product has spare slots to begin with)

imo... there's 2 things ppl ussualy consider when choosing part

1st the stats, for most Arena Fighter this thing are most important. Less cost, high stat ,more room for tune, that what make win.
2nd the look, for most skinners this thing are most important, they gonna say "screw performance i need beauty".

Smaller usually = better.
Also, you can't judge based on alphaing and then watching how close the projectile is to the center dot because 1)some projectiles are fucking gigantic and will cover more than the recticle, and 2)you're not moving when you're alphaing unless you have Moving Burst or are falling because you alpha'd in the air. Therefore, your accuracy is better.
Projectile size also counts.
So does player skill.

We need CS to either fix this or tell us the accuracy values on the AM's...

Aurao wrote:

We need CS to either fix this or tell us the accuracy values on the AM's...

This, Cause out of all the flaws in cb this ones a coding error and everything cause it was not done intentionally by the developers.

boytitan2 wrote:

Aurao wrote:

We need CS to either fix this or tell us the accuracy values on the AM's...

This, Cause out of all the flaws in cb this ones a coding error and everything cause it was not done intentionally by the developers.

This is not FPS, silly. Welcome to Cosmic Break.
If you can't deal with the fact that some AMs are less accurate than others, qq more, deal with it, or quit.

What? This is no "coding error" and neither is there some kind of "accuracy value".
Everything depends on the size and shape of the arm (and actually the weapon too).

the idea of this topic is to point out which am's seem to have better aim, not debate why cyberstep sucks and why they can't make arms properly, quit the debating and get back on topic.