| | Gunner Squealer? No. |  |
|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
subzero1112
Regular Poster
 Posts : 138
Join date : 2010-12-25
Age : 27
Location : Philippines
| | Subject: Gunner Squealer? No. Sat Aug 25, 2012 11:15 pm | |
| Yeah, since "I R LOLNOOBZ" at using cosmic calc, I'mma list down my parts: -Red Squealer BD -Pulsardio HD -Sharhead AM ---Buster Gatling -SteelRider LG Yes, it only has one arm. 
Last edited by subzero1112 on Sun Aug 26, 2012 12:20 am; edited 1 time in total | |
|
| | |
Scott-kip
Adept Poster
Posts : 941
Join date : 2011-07-07
Age : 27
Location : Not where Akhenderson is but close!?!?
| | Subject: Re: Gunner Squealer? No. Sat Aug 25, 2012 11:54 pm | |
| Squealer BD has 11 STR and 6 TEC, if you want a gatling I would personally go with a combat gatling as a side arm with Squealer AMs if im using him, but If you can actually do good with that build then I wont argue.
Also, shouldnt this be in questions? | |
|
| | |
subzero1112
Regular Poster
Posts : 138
Join date : 2010-12-25
Age : 27
Location : Philippines
| | Subject: Re: Gunner Squealer? No. Sun Aug 26, 2012 12:19 am | |
| Well, I could use the RQ BD to escape from tight situations but I just wanted an excuse to use a gunner LND with gatling. | |
|
| | |
Aurum_Sol
Ace Poster
Posts : 1761
Join date : 2011-05-26
| | Subject: Re: Gunner Squealer? No. Sun Aug 26, 2012 7:08 am | |
| the error of the build starts at "buster gattling"
no matter what you will do with the squealer, use a different gattling, the only gattling that is currently worse is propably ion TS gattling >.> | |
|
| | |
subzero1112
Regular Poster
Posts : 138
Join date : 2010-12-25
Age : 27
Location : Philippines
| | Subject: Re: Gunner Squealer? No. Sun Aug 26, 2012 10:24 am | |
| Yeah, took that Gat and put it on Sharhead, I have no idea if it was just the OP bots/skill of my allies or insane luck but it seems to be good at countering most things. | |
|
| | |
Aurum_Sol
Ace Poster
Posts : 1761
Join date : 2011-05-26
| | Subject: Re: Gunner Squealer? No. Sun Aug 26, 2012 10:31 am | |
| putting buster gattling on another bot doesnt turn it into a better weapon ...
i will just repeat myself: use a different gattling | |
|
| | |
subzero1112
Regular Poster
Posts : 138
Join date : 2010-12-25
Age : 27
Location : Philippines
| | Subject: Re: Gunner Squealer? No. Sun Aug 26, 2012 10:40 am | |
| - Aurum_Sol wrote:
- putting buster gattling on another bot doesnt turn it into a better weapon ...
i will just repeat myself: use a different gattling I don't know where to get any other gatling. I'm not willing to spend money on CB. | |
|
| | |
Astral_Dono
野獣先輩
Posts : 7875
Join date : 2011-06-10
Age : 30
Location : Mars
| | Subject: Re: Gunner Squealer? No. Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:15 am | |
| - Aurum_Sol wrote:
- the error of the build starts at "buster gattling"
no matter what you will do with the squealer, use a different gattling, the only gattling that is currently worse is propably ion TS gattling >.> Huge Gattling Mod is worse. | |
|
| | |
Suguri
God Poster
 Posts : 7765
Join date : 2011-01-07
Age : 25
Location : Japan
| | Subject: Re: Gunner Squealer? No. Sun Aug 26, 2012 4:14 pm | |
| - Astral_Goddess wrote:
- Aurum_Sol wrote:
- the error of the build starts at "buster gattling"
no matter what you will do with the squealer, use a different gattling, the only gattling that is currently worse is propably ion TS gattling >.> Huge Gattling Mod is worse. Huge Gatling Mod at least does damage. I'd use it over Buster any day. | |
|
| | |
Fireflywater
Ace Poster
Posts : 1220
Join date : 2011-05-22
Age : 28
Location : The Undead Daily Garapon
| | Subject: Re: Gunner Squealer? No. Sun Aug 26, 2012 4:16 pm | |
| Huge Gatling is best gatling, arguably. Due to damage, ammo, and round size I think.
Buster Gatling has huge ammo reserves, and is the easiest to obtain. Someone with an ammo fetish like me could easily tune it with ammo-draining tunes and hardly get effected.
Or you could skip gatlings entirely and be manly and use Boost Gun or Magnums. | |
|
| | |
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: Gunner Squealer? No. | |
| |
|
| | |
| | Gunner Squealer? No. | |
|
